Cruise ships and coronavirus: Carnival offers its ships as floating hospitals

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 4 years ago

Cruise ships and coronavirus: Carnival offers its ships as floating hospitals

By Hannah Sampson
Updated
With cruises banned from operating, Carnival has offered its ships to be used as temporary hospitals.

With cruises banned from operating, Carnival has offered its ships to be used as temporary hospitals. Credit: Bloomberg

The world's largest cruise operator on Thursday pitched its ships as temporary floating hospitals to authorities around the world who are struggling to respond to the coronavirus pandemic.

"Carnival Corporation and its brands are calling on governments and health authorities to consider using cruise ships as temporary healthcare facilities to treat non-covid-19 patients, freeing up additional space and expanding capacity in land-based hospitals to treat cases of covid-19," the company said in a statement.

Some ships from its lines, including Carnival Cruise Line, Holland America Line, Princess Cruises and P&O Cruises Australia, will be available for use, the statement said. Cruise lines worldwide halted operations last week as the virus continued its rapid spread.

Carnival's offer was notably not a donation: "Interested parties will be asked to cover only the essential costs of the ship's operations while in port," the company said. Crew members would handle maritime operations, food service and cleaning, while, in this proposal, local government bodies or hospitals would take care of medical services.

The US Navy is already preparing to send hospital ships to the harbours in New York and Seattle.

News of the cruise-ship suggestion first emerged during a news conference with President Donald Trump early Thursday. He said Carnival Corp. Chairman Micky Arison had gotten in touch and offered to "make ships available" to dock in hard-hit cities like New York and San Francisco.

Trump did not offer details on how the ships could be used at the time, but said he would bring the idea up to the governors of New York, California and other states Thursday.

"You could increase places to stay, let's say places to stay - if it works," he said. "I don't know, maybe people won't want them."

Cruise lines have been hit hard by the virus. At one point in February, a Princess Cruises ship, the Diamond Princess, had more people test positive than any country but China. That vessel was quarantined for much of last month in Japanese waters. Another ship, the Grand Princess, had a smaller outbreak this month.

Advertisement

The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention warned people this week to defer cruise travel worldwide, after earlier targeting a similar message to people with underlying health conditions. The agency said anyone who has been on a cruise ship in the last two weeks should isolate themselves at home for 14 days after disembarking.

Carnival Corp. made no mention of those issues in its statement, instead highlighting the potential for ships to convert to medical facilities. The company said ships could function as hospitals, with up to 1,000 hospital rooms treating patients with less-critical conditions - not including covid-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. Onboard communication networks could be used to connect patient-monitoring devices, the company said. Medical centres could house as many as seven intensive-care units, the statement said, and different medical functions could be set up on separate decks.

"The rooms also have bathroom facilities, private balconies with access to sun and fresh air, as well as isolation capabilities, as needed," Carnival said.

Cruise ships have been used in times of crisis before. The Federal Emergency Management Agency contracted with Carnival Cruise Line to provide emergency housing and food to victims of Hurricane Katrina from late 2005 until early 2006.

The solution was not widely praised, however: The New York Times reported in 2005 that many evacuees turned down the option, and displaced city workers and their families ended up using the space. And the terms of the charter deal - $US236 million ($A414 million) for six months - quickly came under fire, The Washington Post reported at the time.

A cruise line spokeswoman said in 2005 that the company would make no more money with that deal than it would have by keeping the ships in service, but that didn't appease senators, who called for a chief financial officer to oversee post-hurricane spending.

"Finding out after the fact that we're spending taxpayer money on no-bid contracts and sweetheart deals for cruise lines is no way to run a recovery effort," then-senators Tom Coburn and Barack Obama said in a joint statement.

The Washington Post

Sign up for the Traveller Deals newsletter

Get exclusive travel deals delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up now.

Most viewed on Traveller

Loading