Modern commercial aircraft vs cars: which is more fuel efficient?

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 4 years ago

Modern commercial aircraft vs cars: which is more fuel efficient?

By Michael Gebicki
Open-plan cockpit of an 'Alice' electric aircraft manufactured by Eviation Aircraft.

Open-plan cockpit of an 'Alice' electric aircraft manufactured by Eviation Aircraft.Credit: JASPER JUINEN

A Boeing 787-9 burns about 5400 litres of fuel per hour. At a cruising speed of 900km/h, that equates to 600 litres/100km. On average, a modern family-size vehicle uses about 8 litres/100km, or 75 times less fuel. If there are four people inside that vehicle, each one accounts for 2 litres/100km, and the fuel consumption per passenger per kilometre aboard the 787-9 is very similar.

A fully loaded 787-9 carries about 300 passengers, therefore fuel consumption per passenger is 18 litres per passenger per hour. Travelling at a ground speed of 900km/h, each passenger is covering 50km/litre, or 2 litres/100km. That assumes the aircraft is flying with a full passenger load. A more realistic passenger load is 90 per cent, in which case fuel consumption per passenger is 2.2 litres/100km.

Conversely, if the vehicle is travelling with three aboard instead of four, fuel consumption for each is 2.66 litres/100km. Aircraft engines continue to deliver better fuel efficiency. For a fully loaded Boeing 747-8, the most recent passenger version, the figure per passenger is 2.39litres/100km, one of the main reasons the four-engine jumbo is fading from the skies.

Sign up for the Traveller newsletter

The latest travel news, tips and inspiration delivered to your inbox. Sign up now.

Most viewed on Traveller

Loading