Private jet carbon emissions by the wealthy: There's no flight shaming the rich

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 1 year ago

Private jet carbon emissions by the wealthy: There's no flight shaming the rich

By Lee Tulloch
Celebrities, politicians and business leaders have been criticised for travelling on private jets.

Celebrities, politicians and business leaders have been criticised for travelling on private jets.Credit: iStock

It was a sad week for aviation geeks as Boeing delivered its last 747 this week to cargo carrier Atlas after 52 years of service.

The "jumbo" was the first plane many Australians flew on overseas holidays, but it also brought hundreds of thousands of migrant families to this country. It was superseded by the A380 and other wide-bodied aircraft, but it still has a soft spot in the hearts of many travellers.

I've been thinking about big planes but also about small planes, too, thanks to Bill Gates, who flew to Australia late January, jetting about the country on one of his two Gulfstream 650ER private jets.

Since the pandemic, the use of private jets has soared. Because of the unreliability of commercial flights and the cost of first class, many businesses and well-to-do people opt for the flexibility and convenience of chartered flights, disregarding the fact that private jets, because they carry so few people, are estimated to be five to 14 times more polluting than commercial planes per passenger and 50 times more polluting than high-speed trains.

And then there are the very rich, in a category all by themselves - the "ultra high-net worths" as they are called. For this fraction of the one per cent a private jet is little more than an airborne limo, not only scooting across oceans but dashing a few dozen kilometres to visit the hairdresser.

Gates' private plane may have gone unremarked on if not for the fact that he was in Australia to talk about climate change and promote his sustainable technology businesses. His message was negative - there is "no chance," he said, that the world will keep global warming below 1.5 degrees of heating, which is the ambition of the Paris accord, and it's also unlikely it will be kept below 2.0, which climate scientists say would be catastrophic.

What outraged many was Gates' blithe assessment of the inevitable catastrophe, which climate scientists dispute, while jetting around the world promoting his sustainable and innovative technology business, burning 1800 litres of jet fuel per hour.

Those who fly in private jets argue that the small planes only produce about 4 per cent of all aircraft emissions, so it's a drop in the sky. But look at it another way - private jets emit more than 33 million tonnes of greenhouse gases annually, apparently more than the whole country of Denmark emits in a year.

The world's 500 richest people collectively saw their wealth increase by more than $800 billion at the height of the pandemic, and it's increasing exponentially, so there's every reason to believe the skies will become even more crowded with private jets in future. It's predicted that in the next decade 8500 new business jets will be delivered, 15 per cent above the forecast made a year ago.

Advertisement

A whole industry of people who track the flights of the rich and powerful has grown up in recent times, enraging Elon Musk and Russian oligarchs alike, who consider it an invasion of privacy. The trackers, on the other hand, see it as a public service.

Famously, Taylor Swift has been called out as the worst offender. Her plane (not necessarily with the singer onboard) took 170 flights in the first six months of 2022, totalling 15.9 days in the air with an average flight time of 80 minutes. The total flight emissions for 2022 were calculated at 8,293.54 tonnes – 1184.8 times more than the average person's total annual emissions. Did she perform that many concerts?

Some flights by celebs have been tracked at only nine minutes (Kylie Jenner.)

Britain's Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was recently criticised for taking a private jet on a short flight where he might as easily have taken a train.

About eight years ago, I took my first and only trip by private plane. I can't pretend it wasn't great. But times are different and with so many people sincerely trying to reduce their carbon footprints, the disregard of some of the very rich sends a big raspberry to those who are doing their best with less resources.

It might be a status symbol to boast you sent your dog to the groomer by private jet (yes, there is a company called K9JETS) but it's also a symbol of something abhorrent that's flying us all into the ground.

The only upside is this: 99 per cent of us are never going to have the agonising dilemma, "should I take the private jet shopping or not?"

Lee.tulloch@traveller.com.au

Instagram @bymrsamos

Sign up for the Traveller newsletter

The latest travel news, tips and inspiration delivered to your inbox. Sign up now.

Most viewed on Traveller

Loading